How the Academy teaches
Teaching: from foundational knowledge to supervised practice
Teaching at the Academy moves in a deliberate order, so that each skill is understood, seen and rehearsed before it is performed on a patient, and reviewed after it is.

Eight stages, in order.
Each skill is understood, seen and rehearsed before it is performed, and reviewed after it is.
Foundational knowledge
The anatomy, wound biology and clinical principles that every later decision depends on.
Demonstration
Each technique is shown in full and then broken into its steps, with the reasoning behind each one made explicit.
Simulation
Practice on simulation models, where repetition and error carry no risk to patients.
Supervised practice
Skills are performed under direct supervision, with the level of supervision matched to the learner.
Case-based learning
Real clinical scenarios, discussed without identifiable patient data, to train judgment rather than technique alone.
Feedback
Specific, timely feedback on technique and on the decisions that preceded it.
Assessment
Structured assessment of what has been learned, across knowledge, skill and judgment.
Continued development
Learning does not end with a course: review, reflection and return visits consolidate practice.
Why is teaching sequenced?
Teaching is sequenced because a procedural skill is built in layers: understanding, observation, rehearsal, supervised performance and reflection. Skipping a layer is what turns a capable learner into an uncertain practitioner. The Academy’s programs are designed to follow eight stages in order, while allowing learners to return to earlier stages whenever a skill needs it.
The sequence reflects what learners themselves report. In a survey of doctors in training, most preferred learning in the clinical workspace or a blend of lectures and simulation; very few preferred lectures alone (Duffaydar et al., 2025).
The eight stages in detail
Foundational knowledge
Every later decision depends on anatomy, wound biology and clinical principles. This stage gives learners the concepts they will use in the room, taught through the questions they answer rather than as isolated facts.
Demonstration
Each technique is shown in full and then broken down into its steps, with the reasoning behind each one made explicit. The structure follows Peyton’s four-step approach (demonstration, deconstruction, comprehension and performance), which a meta-analysis found effective for procedural skill acquisition, especially with small groups of learners per teacher (Giacomino et al., 2020).
Simulation
Learners rehearse on simulation models, where repetition and error carry no risk to patients. Practice is organized as deliberate practice: focused, repeated attempts at a defined task with specific feedback, the pattern associated with the development of expert performance (Ericsson, 2004).
Supervised practice
Skills are then performed under direct supervision, with the level of supervision matched to the learner’s demonstrated competence. This stage depends on local regulation and on supervision being available, and it is never a substitute for the learner’s own institutional credentialing.
Case-based learning
Real clinical scenarios, discussed without identifiable patient data, train the judgment that surrounds a technique: whether to close, how, when to stop and when to refer. Cases are where the six phases of the Rafiee Educational Approach come together.
Feedback
Feedback is specific and timely, and it addresses both the technique and the decisions that preceded it. It is designed to be a conversation, so that learners can explain their reasoning as well as correct their hands.
Assessment
What has been learned is assessed across knowledge, skill and judgment, as described in the assessment framework, which is in development. Assessment is designed to support learning first and to certify nothing it cannot demonstrate.
Continued development
Learning does not end with a course. Review, reflection and return visits are designed to consolidate practice, and to answer a question every educator should ask: does what was learned last?
How is patient safety protected in teaching?
By design, technique is rehearsed on simulation models before it is ever performed on a patient, supervised practice is matched to demonstrated competence, and case discussions never include identifiable patient data. Clinical images are used only with documented consent, and never on the Academy’s home page.
What does training not authorize?
Training does not authorize anyone to perform procedures outside their legal scope of practice. Regulation of surgical and aesthetic procedures differs between countries, and often between institutions. Each program states its own scope and boundaries.
Questions
Why is simulation used before supervised practice?
Because simulation allows repetition and error without risk to patients. Technique is rehearsed on simulation models, with feedback, until it is ready to be performed under supervision.
Are real patient cases used in teaching?
Case-based learning uses clinical material without identifiable patient data. Supervised practice on patients depends on local regulation and on appropriate supervision being available.
Does completing a program authorize me to perform procedures?
No. Training does not authorize anyone to perform procedures outside their legal scope of practice, which is defined by each country and, often, by each institution.
Is this teaching model already running?
It is the design of the Academy's programs, which are in development. Its pilot implementation and evaluation are also in development.
Sources
- Giacomino K, Caliesch R, Sattelmayer KM. The effectiveness of the Peyton's 4-step teaching approach on skill acquisition of procedures in health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis with integrated meta-regression. PeerJ. 2020;8:e10129. doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10129
- Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004;79(10 Suppl):S70-S81. doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022
- Duffaydar H, Casals-Farre O, Morgan J, et al. Wound management amongst doctors in training: a cross-sectional study of education and capability. Int Wound J. 2025;22(5):e70674. doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70674