Framework developed · Pilot in development

The Rafiee Educational Approach

A structured way of teaching surgical wound management that treats technique as one part of a continuous clinical judgment: what to do, when, why, how safely, when not to intervene and when to refer.

Surgical instruments laid out in exact order on a steel tray beside an ivory drape.

Six phases, one judgment

Assess, plan, handle, close, protect, follow up.

  1. Assess

    What is in front of me, and what does it need?

    A structured clinical assessment of the patient and the wound before any decision is made: mechanism, location, contamination, tissue viability, function at risk and the patient’s own context.

  2. Plan

    Should this wound be closed, and if so, how and by whom?

    Deciding the objective before the technique: timing, method of closure, anesthesia, the likely scar and its orientation, and whether the case belongs with a specialist.

  3. Handle

    How should the tissues be treated?

    Respectful tissue handling as a clinical skill in its own right: preparation, debridement when indicated, atraumatic technique and the preservation of what will be needed to heal well.

  4. Close

    Which closure protects function and future healing?

    Choosing and executing a closure that restores alignment without excess tension: layered repair when appropriate, edge eversion, and suture selection matched to site and purpose.

  5. Protect

    What protects the wound while it heals?

    Care of the repair after the last stitch: dressing, tension management, infection awareness, patient instructions and the early measures that influence how a scar matures.

  6. Follow-up

    Is healing on course, and when should someone else be involved?

    Reviewing healing and scar maturation over time, recognizing complications early, and knowing when intervention should stop and specialist referral should begin.

From wound assessment to scar optimization

The Rafiee Wound-to-Scar™ Approach

A structured educational approach to the assessment, management, closure, protection and follow-up of wounds and minor surgical injuries.

The principle

It is built on a simple principle:

Every wound should be approached with consideration not only for immediate function and safety, but also for its potential healing and scar outcome.

The approach integrates clinical judgment, wound assessment, tissue handling, safe procedural technique, aesthetic closure principles and appropriate referral into a continuous clinical process: Assess, Plan, Handle, Close, Protect and Follow-up.

Educational purpose

The approach is designed to help healthcare professionals:

  1. assess wounds and minor injuries systematically
  2. recognize relevant anatomical and tissue considerations
  3. determine appropriate management and closure strategies
  4. apply principles of safe tissue handling and aesthetic closure
  5. anticipate factors that may influence healing and scar formation
  6. recognize complications and warning signs
  7. understand when not to intervene
  8. make appropriate referral decisions
  9. provide appropriate follow-up and wound protection

What learners develop

The objective is not simply to teach physicians how to close a wound. It is to develop the ability to determine:

  • what should be done
  • how it should be done
  • when intervention is appropriate
  • when it should be limited
  • when specialist referral is necessary

Through structured learning, demonstration, simulation, supervised practice and clinical case analysis, the approach is designed to help healthcare professionals progressively develop practical skills while maintaining patient safety and respecting the limits of their professional scope.

A broader vision

The approach is intended to contribute to a generation of physicians who can combine knowledge, technical precision, clinical judgment and aesthetic awareness in everyday practice, outpatient procedures and situations requiring timely wound management.

In circumstances of increased healthcare demand, emergencies or limited access to specialist care, appropriate early management may be particularly important. The emphasis, however, remains on patient safety, competent intervention, responsible restraint and timely referral.

Educational scope

The Rafiee Wound-to-Scar Approach does not confer authorization to perform procedures beyond a practitioner's professional qualifications, training, licensing or local regulations. It is an educational framework intended to develop practical competence within appropriate professional scope and does not replace specialist surgical training or the role of a plastic surgeon when specialist intervention is indicated.

What is the Rafiee Educational Approach?

The Rafiee Educational Approach is a six-phase framework for teaching surgical wound management and scar optimization (Assess, Plan, Handle, Close, Protect and Follow-up), developed by surgeon and medical educator Dr. S. Nouri Rafiee. The framework has been developed; its pilot implementation and evaluation are in development.

Its premise is simple to state and demanding to teach: the scar a patient lives with is the result of a chain of decisions, not of a single stitch. The approach makes each of those decisions visible, in the order in which they are made, so that they can be taught, practiced and assessed.

Why does it teach judgment and not only technique?

Because technique alone does not tell a clinician what to do first, whether a wound should be closed at all, or when to stop. Health professionals should learn not only how to perform a procedure, but when to perform it, why to perform it, how to perform it safely, how to evaluate the result, when not to intervene and when specialist referral is required.

Most procedural teaching concentrates on the first of those questions. The Rafiee Educational Approach gives the other six the same weight. It is designed so that a learner who completes it can explain a decision, not only carry it out, and can recognize the moment when the right decision is to do less, or to refer.

The six phases

Each phase corresponds to a moment in the care of a wound in which a different decision is made. The phases are taught in sequence, but they are not a checklist: judgment runs through all of them, and any phase can lead to the conclusion that the case belongs with someone else.

Assess

Everything begins with a structured assessment of the patient and of the wound: mechanism of injury, time since injury, contamination, tissue viability, the structures that may be involved and the patient factors that change how a wound heals. The learner is expected to describe the wound precisely and to identify features that change the plan, such as possible injury to nerves, tendons, vessels or ducts, signs of infection or foreign material.

When not to intervene: when assessment reveals involvement of deeper structures, significant tissue loss or a situation beyond the clinician’s competence, the correct outcome of this phase is referral.

Plan

Planning decides the objective before the technique. Should this wound be closed now, later, or allowed to heal by secondary intention? Which anesthesia, which closure, which orientation of the future scar along the skin tension lines? Planning is where the scar is first considered, before it exists.

The learner is expected to justify a plan and to name its alternatives. Referral at this phase is appropriate when the best plan requires skills, resources or follow-up that the setting cannot provide.

Handle

Tissue handling is treated as a clinical skill in its own right. Preparation, irrigation, debridement when indicated, hemostasis and atraumatic technique decide a large part of the result before closure begins. Tissue that is crushed, dried or devitalized heals less well, whatever the quality of the suture that follows.

The learner is expected to handle tissue gently and deliberately, and to recognize when debridement or hemostasis exceeds what can be done safely in the setting.

Close

Closure restores alignment without excess tension. It includes layered repair when appropriate, edge eversion, and the choice of suture material and technique according to site, tension and purpose. The subcuticular, simple interrupted and mattress sutures each have their place, and each has a cost; Aesthetic Surgical Skills for Physicians is dedicated to them.

The learner is expected to match technique to the wound rather than apply one technique to every wound, and to recognize closures that belong with a specialist.

Protect

Care of the repair does not end with the last stitch. Dressing, tension management, infection awareness, suture removal timing and clear patient instructions protect the repair in the days and weeks that follow, and influence how a scar matures.

The learner is expected to give patients specific aftercare instructions and to explain which signs should bring them back early.

Follow-up

Follow-up reviews healing and scar maturation over time. It is where early complications are recognized, where abnormal scarring such as hypertrophic scars and keloids can be identified early, and where intervention should stop and specialist referral begin.

The learner is expected to know the normal course of scar maturation and the signs that healing is departing from it.

What does the approach draw on?

The Rafiee Educational Approach draws on established principles of procedural skills education. Demonstration is structured along the lines of Peyton’s four-step approach, which a meta-analysis found effective for procedural skill acquisition, particularly with small groups of learners per teacher (Giacomino et al., 2020). Practice is organized as deliberate practice: focused repetition with specific feedback, the pattern associated with the development of expert performance (Ericsson, 2004). Progression is mapped onto Miller’s pyramid, from knowing and knowing how to showing how and, finally, doing (Miller, 1990).

As an integrated framework, the approach has not yet been formally evaluated. A pilot evaluation is in development, and its methods and results will be reported on the research page.

How does it relate to the programs?

The approach is the common structure of the Academy’s teaching. Wound-to-Scar™ applies all six phases to surgical wound management and scar optimization. Foundations of Clinical & Minimally Invasive Procedural Medicine lays the procedural ground the other programs stand on. Aesthetic Surgical Skills for Physicians concentrates on Handle and Close. Clinical Aesthetic Practice & Patient Safety applies the same logic of assessment, planning, protection and follow-up to aesthetic practice.

Beyond the core programs, the advanced and specialized programs apply the approach in depth: Clinical Simulation, Procedural Skills & Assessment to how skills are practiced and assessed, Aesthetic Consultation, Ethics & Practice Development to the consultation and the organization of a practice, and Clinical Imaging & Ultrasound in Aesthetic Medicine to what lies beneath the surface before any procedure.

Program 05, on wound biology, genetics and regenerative medicine, is a research line. It studies the science behind the phases rather than teaching them.

Where does the approach stand today?

The framework has been developed. Its pilot implementation and evaluation are in development, and the Academy is building an assessment framework to measure what learners know, what they can do and how they decide. Until that evidence exists, the approach is presented for what it is: a structured, evidence-informed way of teaching, not a validated method.

Questions about the approach

Is the Rafiee Educational Approach a validated method?

No, not yet. The framework has been developed and draws on established principles of procedural skills education, but as an integrated framework it has not been formally evaluated. A pilot evaluation is in development, and its results will be published whatever they show.

Why six phases?

Because each phase corresponds to a moment in which a different decision is made: understanding the wound, deciding what to do, preparing the tissues, closing, protecting the repair and following healing to the scar. Teaching them in sequence makes each decision explicit.

Does the approach apply only to surgeons?

No. It is designed for physicians and physicians in training who manage wounds in any setting, as well as for those entering aesthetic practice. The principles are the same; the depth differs by program.

Where does referral fit in?

At every phase. Knowing when intervention should stop and a specialist should be involved is taught as an outcome in its own right, not as an exception.

How can I learn the approach?

Through the Academy's programs, starting with the flagship Wound-to-Scar™. They are in development; registering interest is the way to hear first when an edition is announced.

Sources

  1. Giacomino K, Caliesch R, Sattelmayer KM. The effectiveness of the Peyton's 4-step teaching approach on skill acquisition of procedures in health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis with integrated meta-regression. PeerJ. 2020;8:e10129. doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10129
  2. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004;79(10 Suppl):S70-S81. doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022
  3. Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65(9 Suppl):S63-S67. doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045